In this way, Germany must possess sufficient strategic composure, and the governnt must maintain a clear mind and high efficiency, but under the leadership of William II, it’s obviously not likely for Germany to achieve these points.
Moreover, even if Germany can always maintain the best state, to achieve ultimate victory, external conditions are required, that is, the governnts of other countries falling into decay or governance errors. Suppose the UK, France, and Russia were countries like Austria-Hungary, then perhaps there would be a chance.
The reason Austria-Hungary was weak among European powers was mainly due to fundantal defects in its system; without a unified strong governnt, Austria-Hungary could not fully implent many beneficial policies.
Moreover, the most fatal problem is that Austria-Hungary, this inefficient governnt, is still Germany’s most important ally, further increasing the difficulty of Germany achieving victory in the war.
East Africa, the United States, and Germany are entirely different. For East Africa and the United States, war is a non-essential option, at least in terms of large-scale decisive battles. The situation in Europe can be described as having a significant impact on everything.
The United States and East Africa have no such worries; after all, the United Kingdom can’t let Canada and the United States clash, nor let Egypt or South Africa attack East Africa.
As regional powers, East Africa and the United States have no strong forces around that can threaten the two countries. If the above events occur, the two countries can instead expand logically.
The transition of world dominance is basically impossible to achieve peacefully. To capture the international market controlled by the UK and France, scenarios of regional turmoil and wars are inevitable.
The geopolitical advantages of East Africa and the United States enable the two countries to maneuver with traditional powers like the UK and France, even if this process is sowhat prolonged.
In the past life, even without Germany disrupting the European situation, the United States could step by step achieve its goals, though the final outco might not be as ideal.
Of course, currently, the East African governnt still doesn’t have any idea on this matter. In this regard, East Africa and the United States are basically aligned, as the two countries have better options—letting Europe beco chaotic on its own.
...
"During the 2-5 plan, our country’s annual average growth in consur goods was about three percent, and the national living standards significantly improved, especially the substantial increase in the consumption of light industrial goods, with household appliances being the most prominent."
"The consumption of textiles and food also significantly increased. Among food consumption, the per capita consumption of at and dairy products has significantly improved, already surpassing the standards of so European countries. In at products, pork and beef account for the highest proportion, followed by poultry and lastly lamb and other ats."
As a German country, and under the dual influence of immigration from the Far East Empire, pork has always been a at source with relatively high acceptance among East Africans.
Of course, before the 1990s, the sales of pork in East Africa were far less than beef, with pork consumption being limited by production.
This situation was reversed after the 1990s, mainly because East African agriculture had already matured, and the prices of international agricultural products, especially grains, remained low. To consu the surplus grains, East Africa began to develop large-scale livestock farming.
Pig farming began to rise on a large scale in East Africa, and until now, pork has beco the primary at source for East African citizens.
Certainly, this is closely related to the diversified cooking thods in East Africa. The German Region, the Far East Empire, and the Slavic regions, the three primary sources of immigrants in East Africa, each have their own techniques for processing at.
Especially pork, which is relatively difficult to handle, requires higher standards in farming and cooking techniques. As an immigrant country, East Africa has greatly enriched its thods of cooking and preserving at.
Sausage, cured at, smoked at, braised, stir-fried, and other thods, coupled with the promotion of farming and slaughtering techniques in East Africa, have allowed pork to be effectively turned into various delicacies, thus being widely promoted across the nation in East Africa.
Of course, pork is highly popular in East Africa not only due to dietary traditions, improvents in breeding and slaughtering technology, and diverse cooking thods, but also because of East Africa’s local environntal climate.
Although East Africa has abundant grasslands, the quality of cattle and sheep produced in the tropical savannah climate can’t ultimately compare with other regions, which also provided conditions for the increased consumption of pork in East Africa.
Not to ntion East Africa, even Germany, and Denmark, countries with superior grasslands due to their temperate oceanic climate, have pork consumption levels higher than beef.
Overall, East African at consumption is moving toward diversification. Although pork and beef currently dominate, other at consumption is also rapidly increasing, especially poultry.
Arc
Lamb, cal at, fish at, horse at, donkey at, and other at sources are also increasing. In the southern part of East Africa, that is the South African Plateau region, lamb is abundantly produced, while in the Northwest Somali region, cal at is a characteristic at source. Horse at in East Africa is relatively niche, fish at is also quite popular in East Africa, though limited by geography, concentrated near coastal and lake river areas. As for donkey at, for many East Africans, it is a completely new experience, with donkey at cooking techniques mainly coming from the northern part of the Far East Empire.
"Currently, our country’s at consumption is developing in a diversified direction, and with the developnt of animal husbandry and breeding industries, per capita at consumption has significantly improved, and the physical fitness of the citizens has markedly improved. According to the 1909 military recruitnt standards, the height alone has increased by two centiters compared to the 1980s."
Regarding height, East Africans were not considered short from the beginning, and now the average height of East Africans is above the world average line. In the 1909 sample survey, the average height of East African adult males was about 172 cm, adult females were 163 cm, aning the current average height of East Africans is about 167.5 cm.
This level is equivalent to France, where the average French height is 167 cm, Germany is 169 cm, and the Netherlands is 171 cm.
Height is clearly directly related to living standards; just like current Europeans’ height has increased significantly compared to the past.
In the mid-20th century, the average height of the Dutch and French was only about 165 cm, and Germany was only about 163 cm. From early East African average height data, in the 1970s, the average height in East Africa was just over 160 cm, with the severely malnourished immigrant population being the main reason for the low average height in East Africa at that ti.
Over decades, the average height of East Africans increased by nearly ten centiters, which is an important manifestation of the improvent in East African living standards.
Germany’s average height surpassing France is also related to Germany’s rapid economic developnt; in the mid-20th century, Germany was slightly inferior to France, but now it is above France, which is hard to explain.
In the mid-20th century, Germany was not yet unified, and years of war greatly affected German production. The German Region was a major area of population outflow globally, but now Germany’s industrial developnt and political stability have created conditions for agricultural developnt, leading to a significant improvent in Germans’ quality of life.
The most illustrative case is Russia; today, Russians are apparently not as tall and robust as the Russians in the past life, because with low living standards, Russian soldiers are almost the shortest among European countries.
The average height of Russian soldiers is only about 165 cm. One must know that the military’s height restrictions are relatively lenient, but they can generally reflect accurate data on the healthy male height in a country.
Moreover, Russian requirents in Poland, Ukraine, and other regions are even lower, while the highest height is in so Baltic territories. Russian European and Asian portions have soldiers’ heights in the interdiate position; in this era, Poland and Ukraine can be seen as relatively impoverished areas in terms of Russian developnt.
As for Russia’s Asian part, although the population is small, this doesn’t an their living quality is poor, especially with at contributing to a larger proportion in the diet. After all, the Asian territories of Russia are not suitable for agricultural planting.
User Comments
0 comments from readers