Ti flies.
Two weeks have passed.
Zhao Yi secluded himself at ho for nearly ten days, only returning to school to attend classes as usual once public debates began to wane.
The massive bombardnt of public opinion started to fade out.
The number of dia reporters coming for interviews decreased, making life a bit more normal.
The Particle Boundary Theory is indeed challenging, mainly in terms of its mathematical frawork and analysis, but the entire paper is less than ten pages long. Despite its complexity, it’s bound to be thoroughly researched due to its brevity.
The academic community praised the Particle Boundary Theory as a "brilliant discourse on particle energy!"
"The paper is a theoretical assumption about particle energy, able to explain many existing laws. It holds enormous potential for future research, but it cannot be proven in a short period."
"The mathematical frawork is intriguing, maybe we could study particles from this perspective."
"I hope one day we can genuinely prove that the mathematical proofs in the paper are correct."
"This could help solve a lot of problems and may even make a significant contribution to the unification of forces."
"..."
Many physicists also stated that they would base their research on the Particle Boundary Theory.
It’s a great start.
Many scholars contrasted the Particle Boundary Theory with String Theory. There is no conflict; instead, they are sowhat complentary in content. Both theories explain the microscopic components based on mathematical fraworks.
Many physicists confidently stated, "Just like string theory, the Particle Boundary Theory has the potential to develop into a ’theoretical physics discipline’."
While potential is great, future developnt is yet to co.
Zhao Yi didn’t continue considering the Particle Boundary Theory because there was no clear direction for further research. Such insights are crucial for research.
Which direction to explore?
How to start the research?
These answers often co in flashes of inspiration, and relentless pondering hardly serves any purpose.
He received a system prompt--
[Completed research on the Particle Boundary Theory!]
[Research Coin 12.]
[Academic reputation increased!]
[Research Coin 12.]
[As academic reputation increases, Study Coin 2400!]
A substantial increase in Study Coin is the advantage of public coverage.
The more the research reaches the public, the more reputation one gains, bringing in more Study Coins.
Zhao Yi was quite satisfied.
In real life, he received many congratulations from friends, including Terence Tao and Kibor overseas, and Edward Witten, with whom he’d collaborated on multi-dinsional research in string theory.
Edward Witten even actively reached out for a video chat, congratulating him on-screen, "I read your particle energy research; it is fantastic!"
"A perfect piece of mathematical discourse!"
"Such a pity, I haven’t figured out how to carry out the research on multi-dinsional space, and you’ve already presented a theory." he added, seemingly dismayed
Compared to Zhao Yi, Edward is a bonafide physicist. In their joint research, Edward is in charge of physical pondering; Zhao Yi only handles mathematics.
But it’s disconcerting that while there’s no breakthrough in physics, Zhao Yi has already presented a new theory that leaves him feeling envious.
Eventually, Edward added, "I’ve been conducting research on multi-dinsional space recently, and I believe the results will co soon."
"I’m looking forward to it!" Zhao Yi responded sincerely as he was genuinely eager.
Though he’s confident in his abilities, winning the Nobel Prize in Physics necessitates more than just abilities; inspiration is even more critical.
Many Nobel physics laureates didn’t necessarily have extraordinary research skills. They simply had good luck to conduct research that earned the Nobel Prize.
The two are distinctly different.
No one knows which research might win the Nobel Prize, especially in physics where a study might eventually be proven wrong. Experintal physicists rely a bit on "luck". Identifying a good research topic can be more critical than theoretical skills or research abilities.
The Nobel Prize in Physics isn’t like a competition ranking where high research level guarantees a win. Even conducting research can be a matter of luck.
Zhao Yi was on the lookout for inspiration.
Collaborative research can bring different perspectives, potentially inspiring his own work.
Once things returned to normal, Zhao Yi focused solely on lab work, specifically researching the ’Vif’ gene of the AIDS virus.
The key to this research is to analyze the structure of the ’Vif’ gene, which requires continuous gene testing.
Gene testing isn’t sothing that a machine could directly perform. The primary role of a machine is to compare gene fragnts, not directly indicating ’what the gene does’.
To analyze the gene structure, one must conduct continuous comparison experints and analyze the action process of the virus.
This is a complicated process.
Zhao Yi found that he had lost his grip on this.
He could still conduct so minor experints during the previous Rheumatoid Arthritis project, but when it ca to designing experints to determine the gene structure, he lacked the theoretical foundation.
Zhao Yi had to hand over the work to Ai Lixin, Zhang Wei, and Yan Yi, overseeing the experintal process and interpreting results.
User Comments
0 comments from readers