Cai Zhiyuan explained, "If you could have realized this point earlier, you actually could have created 6 ’childbirth badges’ in the first judgnt room. This isn’t hard to do, unless you chose not to ask the audience when answering the entrance questions and insisted on guessing yourselves.
"In the second judgnt room, you could create 2 ’childbirth badges’ and 1 ’female badge.’
"In the third judgnt room, you could create 1 ’childbirth badge.’
"By the ti you returned to the initial venue, even in the worst-case scenario where the consistency votes received 30 ’×’s, you’d still have a 54% success rate.
"You’d only need to create one more ’male badge.’ Even with only a 54% probability, you could attempt to forcibly create it.
"This chanism is also a kind of taphor, a taphor for ’childbirth’ itself.
"If there’s no childbirth plan, then it doesn’t matter at all. Bearing the consequences yourself is quite reasonable.
"But if there is a childbirth plan, then the earlier the better. The more you delay, the more problems arise.
"The more players are inclined to create badges early, the more likely they are to discover this chanism in the first judgnt room and adjust their subsequent ga strategy.
"Conversely, the more people tend to create childbirth badges only at the end, the more they hesitate, the more easily they’re influenced by public opinion and various other complex factors, and the more they have to endure ’advanced maternal age’ problems."
Yang Yuting said sowhat regretfully, "Yes, how could we not have realized this...
"I understand. Part of the reason lies in the gender allocation of chanisms 1 and 2.
"Because Jiang He bound chanism 1 to females and chanism 2 to males, it caused a mismatch of resources.
"There were more female players, but both Chen Yui and I worried we couldn’t withstand chanism 1’s weight, and Jiang He’s stamina could at most only manage once.
"On the male players’ side, there were fewer people. After Li Jiang used chanism 2 twice consecutively, he also beca afraid due to the severe pain.
"We all developed psychological rejection and resistance to the corresponding chanisms, subconsciously not wanting to use them a second ti.
"If it were reversed and Li Jiang used chanism 1, with sufficient stamina he very likely would have tried using it consecutively. In that case, we’d be more likely to discover this chanism..."
Qin Yao said sowhat surprised, "Put this way, Lawyer Lin’s initial ’kill all’ suggestion really was the simplest solution to this ga?
"Three questions total, two chances to ask for help. Even answering only 2 correctly, if all criminals were killed, that’s a total of 300,000 childbirth fund.
"Even with only Li Jiang alone, you could choose to have him use the 15,000 tier when using chanism 1.
"Then you three female players could share chanism 2, three tis each, with plenty of surplus remaining.
"If all three questions could be answered correctly, that goes without saying, you could even have several completely harmless chances."
Li Renshu nodded, "Yes, actually we audience mbers realized this during the ga.
"Kill all is the simplest and most direct clearance thod.
"Besides this, you could also choose to kill the 2 people in the first prisoner room, choose disciplinary action for the next 4, or kill the first 4 and choose not guilty for the last two.
"Save all isn’t very reliable, because both ’not guilty’ and ’disciplinary action’ require spending childbirth fund. If only 2 questions are answered correctly, the margin for error would be much lower than kill all."
Yang Yuting felt very defeated, "We didn’t think at all that ’kill all’ was the suggestion Lawyer Lin gave! This is completely unlike your character!"
Lin Sizhi spread his hands, "I emphasize again, this suggestion was just the most feasible clearance suggestion I gave from the audience’s perspective. It doesn’t represent my professional ethics or my personal true views.
"If I were playing this ga myself, I would definitely use other thods.
"Don’t let my reputation suffer because of a ga suggestion."
Yang Yuting asked again, "But how did Lawyer Lin think of this right when entering the ga?"
Lin Sizhi explained, "Mainly because of the information gap.
"The audience knew information about ’consistency voting,’ so they could infer the God’s Imitator’s ga design thinking based on this hidden rule.
"The childbirth torture devices had three different tiers, aning there exists a clearance thod of ’fewer people but reducing chanism difficulty through additional childbirth fund.’
"’Kill all’ wouldn’t affect consistency voting and could obtain additional childbirth fund. It’s most likely a stable clearance route.
"Of course, the God’s Imitator who designed this ga also limited this strategy: they required judgnt panel mbers to personally take action and complete the death penalty judgnt with a dagger."
Yang Yuting obviously hadn’t figured out this issue either, "Yes, requiring us to personally kill people, what kind of twisted taste is this?
"Wouldn’t it be simpler to have chanisms kill them, or instant death?"
Lin Sizhi explained, "This counts as a simple test, and would also affect ’consistency voting’ to so degree.
"Making a death penalty judgnt is a relatively serious matter.
"Wrongful executions certainly can’t be completely avoided, but at least, the person making a death penalty judgnt for the first ti should look the criminal in the eyes and take responsibility for their judgnt.
"In so Western literary works, lords personally execute death penalties and always look the condemned in the eyes. This rule becos a tradition passed down through generations in the lord’s family.
"At least for the first execution, carrying it out personally ensures one retains a baseline reverence for the act of killing.
"If one just casually checks a few boxes on paper or presses a button to complete the execution, then those holding judgnt power will quickly lose the sense of reality about killing, making them more likely to make less careful judgnts.
"Just like how Jiang He decided to kill the first male criminal who caused death through negligence: if she knew in advance she’d have to do it personally, she very likely wouldn’t have made the death penalty judgnt."
Yang Yuting still didn’t quite understand, "But why would this relate to ’consistency voting’?"
Lin Sizhi continued, "Because although ’judgnt consistency’ is sowhat stricter than the concept of ’fairness,’ it’s not completely without ambiguous space.
"Just as in ’King’s Judgnt,’ the king could publicly announce prisoners’ cris and create associations with the prisoner rooms to change so audience mbers’ views;
"’Childbirth Judgnt’ actually has a similar chanism, only it’s not done by speaking but by personally taking action.
"After making a death penalty judgnt, the Chief Judge’s behavior also affects the audience’s impression of her.
"If she dares to personally execute the judgnt and bear all consequences for her decision, then a small portion of the audience might approve of her more, which also helps ’consistency voting.’
"Conversely, if she doesn’t dare personally execute the judgnt and pushes this responsibility to others, that’s adding to the cri. The double standards in judgnt beco more obviously exposed. Even those who favor her can’t deceive themselves into giving biased votes.
"Of course, this chanism ultimately only wins over swing votes and doesn’t work on audience mbers with firm convictions."
User Comments
0 comments from readers