That evening, Lin Sizhi returned to his room and, as usual, checked the newly appeared gas and the ratings of previous gas.
The rating for ’Coward’s Judgnt’ was B, and ’Childbirth Judgnt’ was A. This basically matched Lin Sizhi’s initial expectations.
It could be confird that there were two relatively clear standards regarding ratings:
If a God’s Imitator mixed in relatively many subjective factors in a judgnt ga and showed favoritism toward certain players, the rating would decrease.
For the sa mode, only the first relatively original design had hope of obtaining a high rating, while designs imitating this mode afterward would similarly see their ratings decrease.
At 8 o’clock, a new ga invitation indeed appeared on the computer.
[Hello, Lin Sizhi.]
[In three days, the Gallery will open several different ’screening gas’.]
[Two days ago, the Gallery already sent design invitations for this ’screening ga’ to so God’s Imitators, and they have already completed the ga designs.]
[As an excellent God’s Imitator, you can assist the Gallery in judging whether these God’s Imitators have the qualifications to continue surviving in the New World.]
[The Gallery will show you the ’partial rules’ of a certain ’screening ga’.]
[If you approve of this God’s Imitator’s design, you don’t need to do anything, nor do you need to participate in this ga.]
[If you don’t approve of this God’s Imitator’s design, or believe there is still room for improvent, the Gallery will allow you to add up to 5 rules in the ga.]
[Please note: These rules will be submitted to the God’s Imitator who designed the ga for review. Only with their approval will these rules be written into the ga’s design proposal.]
[You can submit suggestions in two ways:]
[1. If submitted in the form of ’Gallery Suggestion’, you and this God’s Imitator can choose not to enter the ga.]
[2. If submitted in the form of ’God’s Imitator Suggestion’, then after the ga starts, whether voluntary or forced, you and this God’s Imitator must both enter the ga.]
[You are free to make your decision, but please rember:]
[Just as players can slowly change communities, God’s Imitators will also slowly change the Gallery.]
Lin Sizhi carefully read the Gallery’s notification, while comparing it with the notification from ’Blind Date Ga’, and discovered there were actually so differences between the two notifications.
The main difference was:
This ti Lin Sizhi could choose two ways to submit suggestions: ’Gallery Suggestion’ and ’God’s Imitator Suggestion’.
The so-called ’Gallery Suggestion’ could be seen as anonymous mode, aning the other party would think this was the Gallery’s suggestion, not a specific God’s Imitator’s suggestion but if using this anonymous mode, neither party would be forced to enter the ga.
If choosing ’God’s Imitator Suggestion’, it would be similar to the previous ’Blind Date Ga’ situation, roughly equivalent to two God’s Imitators directly facing off in the ga.
The reason for this difference was actually hinted at in the broadcast because God’s Imitators and ga ratings were different.
Last ti, the God’s Imitators designing ’screening gas’ were so less qualified God’s Imitators with clear malicious intent, so the Gallery encouraged other God’s Imitators to complete screening on them.
That is, to clear out incompetent God’s Imitators but after the last purge, most of the remaining God’s Imitators should already be in a relatively ’competent’ state.
So the Gallery’s malice toward them had also clearly lessened.
If Lin Sizhi completely disagreed with this God’s Imitator’s design philosophy and believed they must die, then he could also enter the ga and eliminate them like in ’Blind Date Ga’.
Of course, doing so would also bring certain risks to himself.
But if Lin Sizhi approved of this God’s Imitator’s design philosophy and rely thought so details could be more refined, then he could also submit suggestions anonymously through ’Gallery Suggestion’ to help this God’s Imitator improve the design, without necessarily having to enter the ga for a confrontation.
Lin Sizhi pulled open the drawer and took out the planning docunt.
Like last ti, this was still a severely incomplete planning docunt with only partial rules.
The ga was called ’Fool’s Ga’.
Lin Sizhi first looked at the ’Estimated Mortality Rate’ column, which was a mandatory field for all screening-type gas.
[This ga’s estimated player mortality rate: 0~20%].
This mortality rate was normal, even on the low side.
After all, the mortality rate was at most 20%, and at minimum could even reach 0. This indicated there weren’t too many harsh death rules.
Looking at the number of participants again, like the previous ’Blind Date Ga’, it was also 40 people.
This ant at most 8 deaths would appear in the ga, possibly even fewer.
Lin Sizhi quickly browsed through this planning docunt and confird so key information.
’Fool’s Ga’ would similarly select 40 players from 6 communities to participate, but didn’t limit gender.
Each community was limited to a total of 3-8 people, not fewer than 3, otherwise random selection would occur.
If the total number wasn’t enough for 40 people, it would continue randomly selecting from the 6 communities.
However, before the ga started, there would be a hint during the broadcast segnt.
[This ga is dedicated to fools, and only welcos ’wise fools’ and ’true sages’.]
The total ga duration was 3 hours.
The ga’s basic battle format was clearly derived from ’Rock Paper Scissors’, just transforming these three gestures into different cards.
’Rock’ beca ’Fool Card’, ’Paper’ beca ’Sage Card’, ’Scissors’ beca ’Thief Card’.
The three types of cards still continued the restraint relationship of rock-paper-scissors, but players could only get 5 cards per round. Depending on the deck, the specific quantity distribution among the 5 cards varied.
The ga was divided into two stages. The first stage totaled 1 hour as a practice stage with two-player matched battles. The second stage totaled 2 hours, with all players coming to the ga hall for free battles.
Additionally, players would wear ’oxygen masks’ and ’costu dresses’ throughout the ga, and couldn’t reveal their real nas or community information to other players.
There was only one death penalty for ordinary players in the ga:
If at ga’s end, the chips on a player were negative, their visa ti would be deducted double. And if visa ti was insufficient, they would suffer instant death penalty.
In other words, as long as a player’s chips weren’t negative, they definitely wouldn’t die but the ga certainly wouldn’t only have ’losing cards’ as the one rule for deducting visa ti. It was just that without seeing the complete planning proposal, there was no way to confirm.
Lin Sizhi fell into thought.
The first thing to confirm now was: since this ga was a ’screening-type ga’, what type of people was the God’s Imitator specifically trying to screen out?
Screen out gambling addicts?
Didn’t seem like it.
Because to screen out gambling addicts, they would inevitably need to arrange ’low probability, high return’ ga formats, using illusory probabilities to induce gambling addicts to continuously invest large amounts of resources and ultimately lose everything.
But this ga’s format was essentially a simple card ga transford from ’rock-paper-scissors’, and didn’t seem to have ’low probability, high return’ characteristics.
The real intent seed hidden in that hint.
[This ga is dedicated to fools, and only welcos ’wise fools’ and ’true sages’.]
User Comments
0 comments from readers