God's Imitator Chapter 433: Modular Design

This ant that if a God’s Imitator wanted to use this rule, they would first need to be successfully selected by the Gallery in a 'Judgnt' type ga, then choose a player whose behavior was relatively predictable to beco the 'Super Authority Player,' and try to keep them alive throughout the ga as much as possible. Only then could they successfully activate the 'Super Authority.'

And if they wanted to send a certain player to exit, they would have to predict and manipulate the behavior of this 'Super Authority Player' to so degree.

The additional options within the 'Super Authority' might be able to guide this player's behavior.

For example, a God’s Imitator could set up rules using two different approaches:

Approach One: The Super Authority Player only has the basic function of sending players to exit, with no other killing privileges.

Approach Two: The Super Authority Player must choose between 'mass killing' and 'sending a player to exit.'

If it was a relatively kind-hearted player, then when encountering Approach Two, they would be more likely to choose to sacrifice themselves because they couldn't bear to kill many people.

Of course, since there were too many variables in the actual design and ga progression, no matter how clever the rules were, there was no way to ensure that this 'Super Authority Player' would act 100% according to the God’s Imitator's will.

But through specific rule design and inducent, a God’s Imitator could skillfully increase this probability.

After confirming the rules related to the 'Super Authority Player,' Lin Sizhi closed the pop-up window.

Then he opened his desk drawer and took out the planning docunt for this ti.

In the 'Available Props List' column, two pieces of information were worth noting:

1. Various props related to 'Tarot Cards,' unlimited quantity.

2. Freely designable masks and costu dresses.

Lin Sizhi looked at this ga invitation and fell into deep thought.

First, from the available props list, this ga was almost certainly one where participants would be in costu throughout, like the 'Fool's Ga.' How to more quickly confirm each other's identities would beco part of the ga strategy.

And the ga itself would be best packaged in relation to tarot cards.

Additionally, from the invitation, the biggest difference between this 'Screening' type ga and previous gas was that it had been split into three different modules.

These three modules didn't have detailed explanations of what they specifically corresponded to, they could only be judged from their literal anings.

The designs from three God’s Imitators would definitely have overlapping or conflicting parts. According to the ga invitation, the Gallery would select or modify the overlapping rules, and this was a part that God’s Imitators couldn't control.

But overall, the division of these three modules was still quite clear.

The Basic Confrontation Rules for the Minimal Unit could be viewed as the most fundantal gaplay, and at the sa ti, should also have the right to define the 'minimal basic unit.' For example, one could design '2-player confrontation' as the minimal unit, or design '4-player confrontation' as the minimal unit.

Player Matching and Ga Round Rules ant specifically how players would be matched, whether in non-repeating one-on-one matches or random four-player matches, and how many rounds and how long the ga would last in total.

Reward and Punishnt Rules ant what specific rewards or punishnts would be given after following the previous gaplay and completing the corresponding rounds. Screening gas generally had a specific mortality rate, so what exactly that mortality rate would be should also be determined by this part.

Of course, so detailed rules might reasonably belong to two or even all three parts, so exactly how the Gallery would adopt them was unknown.

Each God’s Imitator could only provide a design proposal for one module, which ant the final ga rules would definitely be pieced together from the rules of three God’s Imitators.

As for which proposal a God’s Imitator would specifically choose to design, there were many influencing factors.

For example, to ensure their rules were selected, a God’s Imitator could choose a module they considered themselves relatively good at designing and where competition wasn't as fierce.

And if a God’s Imitator had so specific purpose that needed to be achieved through a certain module, they could also choose the corresponding module.

Additionally, one point was worth noting: the sequential order of the three modules.

The 'Basic Confrontation Rules for the Minimal Unit' was designed first, which directly determined the ga's fundantal gaplay. If a God’s Imitator designed this part, they could directly master the optimal solution for this type of basic gaplay and should be invincible in most situations.

However, designing this part of the rules also ant not being able to see the subsequent rules.

The later 'Player Matching and Ga Round Rules' and 'Reward and Punishnt Rules,' although more limited in design freedom, could see what the previous part's rules specifically were, and could adaptively make designs based on the rules of the previous parts.

Moreover, how players were matched, how many rounds the ga lasted, and how the final rewards, punishnts, and mortality rate were determined would also have a significant impact on the ga.

The God’s Imitator designing the last module, 'Reward and Punishnt Rules,' actually held the power of life and death over all players. If they really set an extrely high mortality rate and it passed the Gallery's review, then even the most harmless and simple basic confrontation rules would beco extrely cruel.

Overall, all three choices had their advantages and disadvantages, mainly depending on which aspect the God’s Imitator valued more and was better at.

Regarding the design of these three aspects, Lin Sizhi didn't have any particular preference, so after considering for a mont, he decided to choose the first part.

That is, to design 'Basic Confrontation Rules for the Minimal Unit' with relatively simple rules but rich derivative strategies, which might make this screening ga more interesting.

Soon, Lin Sizhi had thought through the basic frawork for this ga.

The basic unit for player confrontation was a two-player match, with one person as the attacker and one as the defender.

The specific gaplay was very simple:

On the confrontation table, there were 22 small boxes placed, each with a corresponding number and tarot card pattern on it.

Box No. 1 was 'The Magician,' Box No. 2 was 'The High Priestess,' and so on sequentially, with the final Box No. 22 being 'The Fool.'

The defender could take any amount of 'Wealth Vouchers' and place them into these 22 different boxes.

The attacker could launch 10 attacks on the defender through certain rules and take away so of the boxes.

There were two different attack thods:

thod One: Directly choose any box to take away.

thod Two: Select a box, confirm not to take it, open it to check the specific number of Wealth Vouchers in the box, then choose another box and guess whether the second box contains more or fewer Wealth Vouchers. If the guess is correct, both boxes can be taken away together.

Additionally, the defender could establish their own rules to replace 'thod Two.'

Of course, these were only the most basic rules. More ti would be needed afterwards to adjust various details, eliminate possible bugs, and make more detailed designs for the various props and scenery in the ga.

So might rely serve a decorative purpose to create atmosphere, while others would hide so traps, making it easier for different players to adopt strategies around this content.