Day 132, and Louis called into his office.
Jennifer Park was already there, sitting in one of the visitor chairs with perfect posture and a notebook.
This isn't good.
"ridian Tech," Louis said without preamble. "Cloud infrastructure company, Series C funding, looking for corporate counsel. They're interviewing five firms. We have a pitch eting next Monday."
He looked between us.
"I'm taking one associate. Unprecedented opportunity—direct client visibility, partnership-level work. I'm choosing between you two based on pitch proposals. Due Friday."
Jennifer's smile was professional and sharp.
"What's the evaluation criteria?"
"Impress . Show you understand the client's needs and how we'd serve them. Best proposal wins."
We left his office together, awkward silence in the hallway.
"May the best associate win," Jennifer said.
"Good luck."
Her smile suggested she didn't think she'd need it.
I spent Day 133 researching.
Not networking—Jennifer was already making rounds, asking associates about ridian's business model, researching the CFO's background on LinkedIn, building a social intelligence map.
I went deeper.
SEC filings for the past three years. Earnings calls. Patent applications. Competitive analysis of their market position.
[WIN RATE CALCULATOR: STRATEGIC APPROACH ANALYSIS]
[JENNIFER'S NETWORKING APPROACH: SOCIAL INTELLIGENCE, RELATIONSHIP BUILDING]
[SCOTT'S RESEARCH APPROACH: PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION, SOLUTION DEVELOPNT]
[CLIENT PROFILE: DAVID PARK - EX-SILICON VALLEY CFO, PRACTICAL, RESULTS-ORIENTED]
[PROBABILITY: PROBLEM-SOLVING APPROACH RESONATES BETTER - 62% (±18%)]
ridian had three major challenges I could identify:
International expansion into Europe—GDPR compliance gaps that had already cost them a $40M opportunity last quarter.
IP portfolio vulnerabilities—their database architecture patents had gaps that competitors could exploit.
M&A positioning—they were perfectly positioned to acquire two smaller competitors, but antitrust complications would require careful navigation.
Jennifer's going to pitch Pearson Hardman's prestige and client list. I'm going to pitch solutions to their actual problems.
Day 135, Louis reviewed our proposals.
Jennifer presented first—thirty-minute PowerPoint about Pearson Hardman's capabilities, impressive client roster, her Harvard Law credentials and federal clerkship experience.
It was polished, comprehensive, and completely generic.
Louis took notes, expression neutral.
My turn.
I opened with a single slide: ridian Tech's three strategic challenges.
"ridian's facing specific problems that will limit their growth if not addressed. I'm not here to pitch Pearson Hardman's prestige—you already know our reputation. I'm here to show you we've done the howork."
Louis leaned forward.
"International expansion. ridian tried entering the European market last quarter and lost a forty-million-dollar contract due to GDPR compliance gaps. Here's our compliance frawork for navigating data sovereignty laws across eight jurisdictions."
I distributed the analysis packet I'd prepared—forty pages of specific regulatory requirents, compliance checklists, implentation tilines.
"IP portfolio. ridian's database architecture is innovative, but you have patent gaps that leave you vulnerable to Chinese competitors. Here's how we'd close them with strategic patent applications."
Second packet—patent analysis, competitive landscape, filing strategy.
"M&A opportunities. You're positioned to acquire CloudNest and DataStream, but consolidation creates antitrust complications. Here's preliminary analysis showing regulatory approval path."
Third packet—rger simulation, antitrust review, approval tiline.
Louis was making notes rapidly.
"You researched their actual business."
"The pitch should be about their needs, not our prestige."
He set down his pen, looked between and Jennifer's still-displayed PowerPoint.
"Thank you both. I'll make my decision by end of day."
At 4:47 PM, Louis's email arrived.
Scott will accompany to the ridian pitch. Jennifer, excellent work on your proposal—we'll find another opportunity for you to demonstrate client developnt skills.
I forwarded the email to Donna with a simple Won the pitch competition.
Her response: Never doubted it. Celebratory dinner tonight?
Jennifer appeared at my desk five minutes later.
"You showed off."
I looked up from my screen.
"I'm sorry?"
"Your presentation. Made mine look generic on purpose."
"I focused on the client's needs. That's not showing off."
Her expression hardened.
"Everything with you is calculated. The pro bono cases for reputation building, dating Harvey's secretary for access, befriending Louis because no one else would—it's all strategy."
The accusation stung more than it should have.
I stood, kept my voice cold.
"You're projecting. I date Donna because I care about her. I work with Louis because he's brilliant and actually teaches. I do pro bono work because people deserve help. Maybe try genuine motivation instead of assuming everyone's as calculating as you."
Jennifer's face flushed.
"You're not as good as everyone thinks."
"Then you should have beaten ."
She left, and I sat back down, hands shaking slightly from adrenaline.
Made an enemy. First real peer-level rival.
From his office, Harvey was watching through the glass walls. Our eyes t briefly before he turned back to his work.
He saw that. Saw defend principles even when it created conflict.
Does that make look strong or naive?
That evening, Donna's apartnt, I told her about Jennifer's accusations.
"She thinks everything I do is strategic manipulation."
Donna was cooking pasta, didn't turn around.
"Is she wrong?"
The question caught off guard.
"About the strategy? No. I do calculate most things. But about the motivations? She's completely wrong."
Donna turned, wooden spoon in hand.
"Then you're learning the hardest lesson—you can be strategic AND genuine, but people will assu you can't be both."
"How do I prove them wrong?"
"You don't. You just keep being both and let them figure it out eventually."
She went back to cooking, and I sat at her small kitchen table, turning a wine glass in my hands.
Jennifer's words sting because they're partially true. I do calculate everything.
The question is whether that negates genuine emotion, or whether both can coexist.
I still didn't have an answer.
MORE POWER STONES And REVIEWS== MORE CHAPTERS
To supporting in Pateron .
with exclusive access to more chapters (based on tiers more chapters for each tiers) on my Patreon, you get more chapters if you ask for more (in few days), plus new fanfic every week! Your support starting at just $6/month helps keep crafting the stories you love across epic universes like [ In The Witcher With Avatar Powers,In The Vikings With Deja Vu System,Stranger Things Demogorgon Tar ...].
By joining, you're not just getting more chapters—you're helping bring new worlds, twists, and adventures to life. Every pledge makes a huge difference!
👉 Join now at patreon/TheFinex5 and start reading today!
User Comments
0 comments from readers