The conference room beca my second ho. Walls covered in tiline printouts, patent diagrams, source code excerpts. Three whiteboards filled with technical analysis. The kind of organized chaos that ant I was three days deep into a case and hadn't surfaced for air.
TechVista's engineering team appeared on the video screen at nine AM sharp. Five engineers, all looking exhausted—Amanda Cross had them working overti to support the litigation.
"Walk through your developnt process," I said. "Start from initial concept."
The lead engineer—David Chen, early thirties, Stanford PhD—pulled up a presentation. "We started research on compression algorithms in January 2008. The goal was creating sothing faster and more efficient than existing solutions. We explored seven different approaches before settling on our current thodology."
"Did you review any competitor patents during this research?"
"We did patent searches to avoid infringent. CloudNine's patent didn't exist yet—they didn't file until November 2009, almost two years after we started."
I made notes. Tiline was crucial. If TechVista started developnt before CloudNine filed their patent, independent developnt beca provable.
"Do you have docuntation of that early research?"
"Everything. Git commits, design docunts, email threads. David's paranoid about this stuff." The engineer smiled slightly. "Pays off now."
We spent three hours going through docuntation. Every design decision, every code commit, every eting note. The picture was clear: TechVista had developed their algorithm thodically, docunting each step, completely unaware of CloudNine's parallel work.
[ **Win Rate Calculator: Evidence Assessnt** ]
Independent Developnt Proof: Strong Docuntation Quality: Exceptional Tiline Clarity: 18-month head start over competitor patent Success Probability Update: 64% (±12%) Key Vulnerability: Harvey will attack credibility of docuntation
After the engineers logged off, I called Dr. Patricia Wong. Patent expert, twenty years experience, testified in forty-plus cases. Her rate was astronomical but Amanda had approved it without hesitation.
"I've reviewed both algorithms," Dr. Wong said over video. She was fifties, Chinese-Arican, spoke with the precision of soone who'd explained complex things to non-technical people thousands of tis. "Superficially similar outcos—both achieve efficient compression. But the underlying thodologies are completely different."
"Explain it like I'm a judge with no technical background."
"CloudNine's algorithm uses a dictionary-based approach—pre-computing common patterns and referencing them. TechVista's uses predictive modeling—analyzing data in real-ti and adapting compression dynamically. Sa destination, different routes."
"Can Harvey argue they're substantially similar?"
"He can try. But the source code is different. The mathematical foundations are different. The only similarity is they both compress data efficiently—which is like saying two cars are the sa because they both have wheels."
I smiled at that. Judges loved simple analogies.
"What's your professional opinion on independent developnt?"
"Based on the docuntation? TechVista clearly developed their algorithm independently. The tiline is unambiguous. They started eighteen months before CloudNine filed. And their approach is sufficiently different that even if they had seen CloudNine's work, it wouldn't have helped them."
"Will you testify to that?"
"Absolutely. This is a clear case of parallel developnt. Happens all the ti in tech—two companies solving the sa problem independently because the problem exists."
We discussed testimony strategy, exhibits, how to present technical evidence to a non-technical judge. Dr. Wong was perfect—credible, articulate, unshakable under cross-examination.
After we hung up, I started drafting the defense strategy mo. Core argunt: independent developnt proved by comprehensive docuntation. Supporting argunts: lack of substantial similarity, different technical approaches, temporal impossibility of copying.
My door opened. Hardman walked in, looked at my whiteboard covered in technical diagrams.
"What am I looking at?"
"Algorithm analysis. TechVista's compression thodology versus CloudNine's. They're fundantally different despite similar outcos."
Hardman picked up my draft mo, skimd it. His expression soured.
"This is defensive. Where's the counterattack?"
"The counterattack is proving they're wrong. That we didn't copy because we didn't need to—our solution is better."
"I want you to go after CloudNine's patent validity. Argue prior art, obviousness, anything that makes their patent look fraudulent."
"That's backup position if independent developnt fails. But our primary defense is stronger—we didn't infringe because we created sothing different."
Hardman set down the mo, looked at directly. "I didn't hire you to play defense, Scott. I hired you to hurt Pearson Hardman."
"You hired to win. This wins." I stood, walked to the whiteboard. "Harvey's going to attack our tiline, imply we're lying about developnt dates. He'll make it emotional—accuse TechVista of stealing, paint them as Silicon Valley pirates. But if I keep it technical, force him to prove actual copying with evidence instead of insinuation, he'll drown in details."
"Harvey doesn't drown."
"Harvey excels at emotional persuasion. He's brilliant at reading people, making juries believe his narrative. But technical patent litigation? That's not his battlefield. It's mine."
Hardman studied for a long mont. "You're betting your partnership on this strategy."
"I'm betting it on winning. And this wins."
He nodded slowly. "Fine. Execute your strategy. But if Harvey starts winning the emotional argunt, you pivot to attacking their patent. Understood?"
"Understood."
After he left, I turned back to my whiteboard. Hardman wanted spectacle. Harvey probably wanted the sa—big dramatic argunts, emotional appeals, courtroom theater.
But this case wasn't about theater. It was about docuntation, tilines, technical proof. The kind of thodical, detail-oriented work that made for boring litigation but clear victories.
I spent the next six hours organizing evidence chronologically. January 2008: initial research begins. March 2008: first prototype code. August 2008: algorithm refinent. November 2009: CloudNine files patent—TechVista already eighteen months into developnt. June 2010: TechVista product launch.
Every step docunted. Every decision recorded. An unbroken chain of evidence proving they'd built this independently.
Harvey would attack it. He'd question the dates, imply backdating, suggest fabricated docuntation. But he'd need proof, not just insinuation. And I didn't think he had it.
[ **Argunt Crusher: Activated - Opponent Analysis** ]
Harvey Specter Strategy Prediction: Primary Approach: Attack docuntation credibility Secondary: Emphasize industry culture of theft Tertiary: Appeal to judge's intuition over technical evidence Weakness: Limited technical expertise, relies on emotional persuasion Recomnded Counter: Force technical specificity, prevent narrative control
My phone buzzed. Text from Donna: How's the big case?
Complex. Technical. Everything Harvey hates.
Good. Use that.
I stared at that ssage, thinking about what she ant. Harvey hated complexity he couldn't simplify. Hated technical details he couldn't spin into compelling narrative. This case was designed to frustrate him.
Thanks for the perspective.
Always. How late are you working?
Probably midnight. Patent law is dense.
Take breaks. You're no good exhausted.
Yes, mom.
I'm serious. Harvey works himself to death and looks like it. Don't beco him.
That hit harder than intended. I looked at my reflection in the darkened window—three-day stubble, bloodshot eyes, suit jacket sowhere behind my chair. I was becoming the thing I'd mocked others for being.
Point taken. I'll leave by eleven.
See you tomorrow night? Dinner?
Yeah. Text the place.
I set the phone down and forced myself to step back from the whiteboard. The evidence was organized. The strategy was solid. Working myself into exhaustion wouldn't make it better.
But leaving felt wrong. Like I was giving Harvey an advantage by not working as hard as him.
"That's his trap," I thought. "He makes everything a competition about who can sacrifice more. Don't play that ga."
I packed up my materials, shut down my laptop, walked out at exactly eleven PM. The office was mostly empty—a few associates grinding on other cases, cleaning crew making rounds.
Outside, the sumr air was thick and warm. Manhattan never quite cooled down in July. I walked toward the subway, thinking about tomorrow's strategy session with Amanda Cross.
My phone buzzed again. Louis: Heard you're buried in patent work. Harvey's doing the sa. Both of you working insane hours.
Winner isn't who works longest. Winner is who works smartest.
Harvey doesn't see it that way.
Harvey's problem, not mine.
I got on the subway, found a seat, closed my eyes. Let the technical details settle in my mind while the train rattled through tunnels.
Tomorrow I'd refine the tiline presentation. Day after, start drafting the motion for summary judgnt. Week from now, probably facing Harvey in discovery conference.
But tonight, I'd just rest.
The train stopped at my station. I climbed the stairs to street level, walked the three blocks to my building. Small apartnt, barely furnished, but it was mine.
Inside, I dropped my bag and collapsed on the couch without turning on lights. City glow through the windows provided enough illumination.
The System humd quietly in the background, organizing today's information, preparing for tomorrow's work. But I let it run without engaging. Didn't need probability calculations right now.
Just needed sleep.
Tomorrow the war continued.
Tonight, I surrendered.
MORE POWER STONES And REVIEWS== MORE CHAPTERS
To supporting in Pateron .
with exclusive access to more chapters (based on tiers more chapters for each tiers) on my Patreon, you get more chapters if you ask for more (in few days), plus new fanfic every week! Your support starting at just $6/month helps keep crafting the stories you love across epic universes like [ In The Witcher With Avatar Powers,In The Vikings With Deja Vu System,Stranger Things Demogorgon Tar ...].
By joining, you're not just getting more chapters—you're helping bring new worlds, twists, and adventures to life. Every pledge makes a huge difference!
👉 Join now at patreon/TheFinex5 and start reading today!
User Comments
0 comments from readers