SCOTT RODEN - HARDMAN & ASSOCIATES
The motion practice turned into trench warfare. Harvey filed to enjoin the tender offer—I countered with precedent showing tender offers couldn't be blocked without proving fraud. Jessica filed for temporary restraining order—I demonstrated procedural compliance rendering injunctive relief inappropriate. Mike filed discovery demands—I objected to fishing expeditions while providing exactly what the law required.
Each filing, each response, each reply brief was a chess move. The System tracked it all.
[ **Win Rate Calculator: Dynamic Assessnt** ]
Success Probability: 48% (±14%) - Fluctuating Recent Developnts: 6% (motion to compel granted), -4% (TRO hearing scheduled) Key Variables: Shareholder sentint, judicial decisions, dia coverage Current Status: Competitive equilibrium
Forty-eight percent. Nearly even odds. Harvey and Jessica fighting together were formidable—every motion they filed was technically sound, strategically smart, designed to slow montum while Jessica worked shareholders behind the scenes.
But I'd anticipated most of their moves. Prepared counter-argunts before they filed. Structured the original tender offer to withstand standard defenses.
"Motion to compel shareholder eting," I told Hardman, showing him my draft. "Forces Carlson to hold special eting within thirty days. Delaware law requires it once we control ten percent and make formal demand."
Hardman read it, smiled. "This forces them to burn ti on procedure instead of defending."
"This forces the fight into the arena where we're strongest—direct shareholder democracy. Harvey can file motions forever, but he can't stop shareholders from voting if they want to."
I filed the motion Friday afternoon. Harvey's response arrived Monday morning—forty-three pages arguing the shareholder eting demand was premature, coercive, designed to manipulate rather than inform.
I read it twice, recognizing Harvey's aggressive style. But also recognizing gaps in the argunt—he was relying on emotional appeals about shareholder protection rather than specific case law.
[ **Argunt Crusher: Activated** ]
Harvey Specter Motion Analysis: Primary Weaknesses: 3 identified 1. Relies on shareholder coercion theory without proving actual coercion 2. Cites cases distinguishable on facts 3. Appeals to judicial discretion without explaining limiting principles Recomnded Counter: Force specific fact findings, emphasize statutory rights
I drafted my reply brief that night, systematically dismantling Harvey's objections. No coercion when shareholders receive full information and make inford choice. Cases he cited involved fraud or inadequate disclosure—neither present here. Judicial discretion doesn't override statutory shareholder eting rights.
Thirty-two pages. Precise. Technical. The kind of brief that frustrated Harvey because it didn't give him emotional angles to attack.
While the motion war raged, I executed the second phase. Called my contact at the Wall Street Journal—established relationship from previous client work, maintained carefully for exactly this purpose.
"Anonymous tip," I said. "Carlson Industries Q2 earnings call tomorrow. Buried in footnote seventeen of their financials—they're acknowledging market share losses and declining margins. Managent doesn't want to highlight it, but it's public information."
The reporter did her job. Next morning, WSJ ran analysis: "Carlson Industries' Hidden Weakness: Why Shareholders Should Consider Premium Offers."
Jessica would suspect information warfare. But she couldn't prove it. The information was public, the reporter did independent analysis, I maintained complete deniability.
[ **Blackmail Archive: Strategic Note** ]
dia Manipulation: Successful Shareholder Sentint Shift: 8% support for takeover Attribution: Zero (maintained deniability) Risk Level: Minimal
My phone rang. Hardman.
"Did you see the Journal article?"
"I saw it. Helpful timing."
"Very helpful. Jessica's going to be furious." He paused. "Good work. Keep the pressure up."
Third phase was direct shareholder outreach. I'd drafted personalized analyses for Carlson's three major institutional investors—pension funds, mutual funds, each with different priorities. For the pension fund: emphasize financial returns and fiduciary duty to beneficiaries. For the growth fund: emphasize value creation through restructuring. For the conservative fund: emphasize premium over current price eliminates downside risk.
Each analysis was factually accurate, legally defensible, strategically targeted.
Jessica was doing the sa thing from the other side—emphasizing managent stability, long-term relationships, risks of hostile acquirer. But she was selling status quo. I was selling improvent.
Status quo was a harder sale when the stock was down thirty percent.
Two weeks in, I t with the pension fund's investnt committee via video conference. Five people, all analyzing whether to tender their shares or support managent.
"Your analysis shows thirty percent premium," the lead analyst said. "But hostile takeovers often fail. If we tender and it fails, we're left holding stock that's probably declined further."
"That's why the tender offer includes a minimum condition," I explained. "If we don't get majority support, the offer terminates and you keep your shares at current value. No downside risk from tendering."
"And if it succeeds?"
"Imdiate thirty percent gain, plus potential for additional value creation through restructuring."
They asked technical questions for an hour. I answered each one precisely, backed by data, never overpromising. The System tracked their reactions—body language, tone, follow-up questions—and adjusted my responses in real-ti.
After they disconnected, I sat in the empty conference room processing. They'd tender. Not certain, but probable. One of three major shareholders swinging to our side shifted the entire battle.
[ **Win Rate Calculator: Updated** ]
Success Probability: 52% (±12%) Key Developnt: Pension fund likely support ( 4%) Remaining Variables: Judicial rulings, other shareholder decisions Tiline: Critical vote in 10 days
Fifty-two percent. Slightly favorable odds. Still close enough that anything could change the outco.
My phone buzzed. Text from Donna: How's the takeover battle?
I hesitated before responding. We'd agreed on rules—no case discussion. But she knew I was fighting Harvey and Jessica. Probably knew more about their strategy than I did.
Intense. Three weeks in, everyone's exhausted.
Harvey's been impossible. Working until midnight, snapping at everyone, treating this like personal vendetta.
Is he winning?
He's fighting. Don't know if that's the sa thing.
I pocketed the phone, thinking about what she'd said. Harvey treating this personally ant he was emotional rather than strategic. That was an advantage—emotional opponents made mistakes.
But it also ant he'd fight harder, longer, more desperately. Wouldn't accept defeat gracefully. Would keep fighting even after the battle was lost.
That night, I worked until two AM preparing for the injunction hearing. Harvey would argue the tender offer was coercive, improperly tid, designed to manipulate rather than inform shareholders. I needed to prove every elent was legally compliant, procedurally sound, substantively fair.
The System helped organize argunts, anticipate counterpoints, structure the presentation. But the creative strategy—that was mine. The System just made execution more efficient.
Around midnight, Hardman stopped by my office. Looked at my whiteboard covered in hearing preparation notes.
"You're doing exactly what I hired you for," he said. "Harvey Specter is losing. Jessica's losing. This is perfect."
I didn't correct him. Didn't explain that I wasn't trying to make Harvey lose—I was trying to make my client win. The distinction mattered to . Probably didn't matter to Hardman.
"Hearing's in three days," I said. "We'll know then if the judge grants preliminary injunction or lets the tender offer proceed."
"And if he grants it?"
"Then we appeal and keep fighting. Takeover battles are marathons, not sprints."
After Hardman left, I shut down my computer and stared out at the city. Sowhere across town, Harvey was probably still working. Mike was probably researching. Jessica was probably calling more shareholders.
We were all exhausted. All fighting our own version of the war. All convinced we were right.
Only the shareholders' vote would settle it.
I packed up and headed ho. The subway was empty, late-night stragglers heading to wherever they needed to be. I found a seat, closed my eyes, let the technical details settle in my mind.
Tomorrow: finalize hearing brief. Day after: witness preparation. Day three: injunction hearing against Harvey and Jessica simultaneously.
The System humd quietly in the background, organizing information, updating probability models. But I tuned it out. Didn't need calculations right now.
Just needed rest.
The train stopped at my station. I walked the three blocks to my building, climbed the stairs, unlocked my apartnt. Small space, mostly empty, but mine.
I collapsed on the couch without turning on lights. Tomorrow would bring more warfare. More motions, more strategy, more chess moves in a ga where both sides were playing for keeps.
But tonight, I'd just accept where we were.
Fifty-two percent odds of winning. Three weeks of brutal litigation. Ten days until the final vote.
Everything I'd worked for—partnership, reputation, proving I belonged at this level—ca down to this case.
No pressure.
I closed my eyes and tried to sleep.
The war continued.
MORE POWER STONES And REVIEWS== MORE CHAPTERS
To supporting in Pateron .
with exclusive access to more chapters (based on tiers more chapters for each tiers) on my Patreon, you get more chapters if you ask for more (in few days), plus new fanfic every week! Your support starting at just $6/month helps keep crafting the stories you love across epic universes like [ In The Witcher With Avatar Powers,In The Vikings With Deja Vu System,Stranger Things Demogorgon Tar ...].
By joining, you're not just getting more chapters—you're helping bring new worlds, twists, and adventures to life. Every pledge makes a huge difference!
👉 Join now at patreon/TheFinex5 and start reading today!
User Comments
0 comments from readers