The financial records were dense. Two hundred pages of investnt docuntation, funding agreents, capital injections, and corporate restructuring. I'd been reading them for three hours, coffee gone cold, eyes burning from screen glare.
But buried on page one-forty-seven, I found it.
Hessington Oil's Ecuador project funding—$50 million capital injection from an investnt fund called Forstman Capital Partners. The deal was structured as bridge financing with aggressive performance targets and severe penalty clauses for missed milestones.
I pulled up my consultant's analysis. Margaret Chen, forensic accountant I'd hired for deep financial review, had flagged the Forstman investnt with a note: "Unusual terms. Review carefully."
I called her.
"Margaret. The Forstman Capital investnt. What made you flag it?"
"The terms. Standard venture capital is partnership-oriented—investors succeed when companies succeed. Forstman's deal was different. He profits whether the project succeeds or fails through complex derivatives and penalty structures. He makes money if Hessington Oil hits targets, but he also makes money if they miss targets and trigger default provisions."
"So he has incentive for them to fail?"
"Not fail exactly. But he doesn't care about their long-term health. He's positioned to profit from aggressive short-term decisions—cost-cutting, accelerated tilines, deferred maintenance. Exactly the kind of choices that create safety risks."
I made notes, thinking through implications. "Send everything you have on Forstman Capital. Investnt history, other companies he's funded, outcos."
"Already compiled. Sending now."
The research file arrived within minutes. I spent the next hour reading about Charles Forstman.
[ **Blackmail Archive: Charles Forstman Profile** ]
Charles Forstman - Investnt Fund Manager Age: 58 Net Worth: Estimated $3.2B Reputation: Predatory investor, aggressive acquisition tactics Pattern: Invests in distressed companies, pushes cost-cutting and expansion Outco: Profits from success OR failure through financial instrunts Legal History: Multiple lawsuits, few successful judgnts (settles strategically) Assessnt: Sophisticated financial operator with questionable ethics
Forstman had a pattern. Invest in companies with growth potential but current instability. Push managent toward aggressive expansion and cost reduction. Structure deals so he profited whether the company succeeded or imploded through default provisions.
Hessington Oil fit perfectly. The Ecuador project was expansion into risky market. Forstman's investnt terms created pressure to cut costs and accelerate tilines. Managent responded by deferring safety equipnt repairs and maintenance.
Then the explosion. Six workers dead. Forstman's investnt still profitable through insurance claims and penalty provisions.
[ **Argunt Crusher: Liability Analysis** ]
Question: Is Forstman liable for worker deaths? Legal Standard: Corporate negligence requires direct control or reckless disregard Evidence: Forstman set financial terms that incentivized cost-cutting Counter: Investnt terms don't create direct operational control Conclusion: Weak direct liability case, strong circumstantial connection
I couldn't prove Forstman was directly liable for the deaths. He was investor, not operator. But his financial structure had created pressure that contributed to the decisions that killed those workers.
Morally complicit. Legally insulated. Classic sophisticated wrongdoing.
I scheduled eting with Zane, brought the Forstman research, laid out the connections.
"Forstman's investnt terms created financial pressure that contributed to managent decisions," I explained. "The cost-cutting that caused the explosion wasn't random—it was response to aggressive performance targets Forstman imposed."
Zane reviewed the docunts carefully. "Can you prove direct liability?"
"No. He's too sophisticated for that. But the connection exists."
"Do you want to add him as defendant?"
I thought about that. Adding Forstman would expand the case, create additional complexity, require more resources. It would also make the case about investor liability rather than corporate negligence.
"No. Not yet. Our case is against Hessington Oil for direct negligence. That's what we can prove. Forstman's involvent is interesting context, but it's not our primary theory."
"Good instinct. Don't expand case just because target is wealthy. Stay focused on what you can prove." Zane paused. "But docunt everything. If Forstman becos relevant later—different case, different context—you'll have the foundation."
"Already archived with priority flag."
Back in my office, I organized the Forstman research into comprehensive file. Financial analysis, investnt pattern docuntation, connection to Hessington Oil's decisions. Everything cataloged, cross-referenced, ready for retrieval if needed.
My fragnted mories whispered sothing about Forstman. Not clear details—just impressions. Future antagonist. Major conflict. Arc 4, maybe. The System agreed with that assessnt.
[ **System Analysis: Future Conflict Probability** ]
Charles Forstman: Significant Figure Pattern Analysis: Investnt practices create ongoing legal exposure Probability of Future Confrontation: 78% Recomnded Action: Maintain intelligence file, monitor activities Arc 4 Setup: High confidence
For now, Forstman was background player. Investor whose financial pressure contributed to tragedy but remained legally insulated. I'd keep the information archived, ready for when circumstances made it relevant.
Because my instinct said we'd face each other eventually. Not in this case. But soon.
The predator and the lawyer who wouldn't look away.
That confrontation was coming.
Just not today.
MORE POWER STONES And REVIEWS== MORE CHAPTERS
To supporting in Pateron .
with exclusive access to more chapters (based on tiers more chapters for each tiers) on my Patreon, you get more chapters if you ask for more (in few days), plus new fanfic every week! Your support starting at just $6/month helps keep crafting the stories you love across epic universes like [ In The Witcher With Avatar Powers,In The Vikings With Deja Vu System,Stranger Things Demogorgon Tar ...].
By joining, you're not just getting more chapters—you're helping bring new worlds, twists, and adventures to life. Every pledge makes a huge difference!
👉 Join now at patreon/TheFinex5 and start reading today!
User Comments
0 comments from readers